Thursday, May 19, 2016

Are Americans Overtaxed

Taxation is an admittedly difficult subject to broach, especially when considering the varying aspects of taxation that appear to the average American. There is income tax, sales tax, property tax, capital gains tax, payroll taxes, and occupational tax. With all of these taxes, creating a completely comprehensive tax profile for an average person would require years of schooling and an intricate knowledge of the American tax system. As a result, this post will only be able to go in depth about a few subjects, such as federal income tax and capital gains taxes. The other taxes very so heavily between states and occupation that attempting to describe all of them would be impossible.

First and foremost, federal income taxes need to be approached. Every person in the country pays some form of federal income tax ranging from 10% for the lowest earners, to 39.2% for the highest earners in the country. The manner of taxation is not that simple however. If someone makes $500,000 a year, they don't pay 39.2% taxes on all of that money. Instead they pay 10% for a portion of that money, then a portion at 15%, and so on and so forth until they reach the highest tax bracket. For a single filer, incomes of  $415,000 and higher are taxed at 39.2%, meaning that every dollar over $415,000 is taxed at the highest rate, but none of the cash flow below that.

As far as capital gains taxes are concerned, they are structured differently as long as the return on investment is larger than a one year time period. If the period on the investment is shorter than one year, than the income made on that investment is taxed at the tax bracket that all the other income of the specific individual. If the investment is longer than a year, the taxes are lowered, with members in the lowest tax bracket paying no taxes on investment and members in the highest tax bracket paying only 20% as opposed to 39.2%. Another interesting angle about capital gains tax is that money made through investments are effectively attacked twice. The money is first taxed at the corporate tax rate, usually 32% when the company receives income for the service that they render. Once the money is taxed at the corporate level, the money is then split and given to the share holders in the form of dividends, which is taxed at the capital gains tax level, an interesting means of taxation.
Figure 2 - Taxes by Source as a Share of Total Tax Revenue
These are all taxation records based on the current year, but a past model and taxation rates around the world are also necessary for a proper consideration of the question; are Americans overtaxed? In 1960, the average american made about $44,000, adjusted for inflation of course. Today, most Americans make around $52,000 which is a good step more. Tax rates were also quite different in 1960, with the average American income being taxed at about 25% compared to 22% nowadays. This difference is not nearly as big as the difference between the high income earners. In 1960, someone who made 1.5 million dollars paid 91% income tax on that money, whereas nowadays they only pay about 40%. This is a huge decrease in just 50 years, but despite this, the government has managed to maintain about the same income levels from taxes.

Finally, tax rates globally play a huge role in the American tax policy. As far as America goes, it has the third lowest tax rate in the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation), which has some of the most powerful economies in the world in its folds. Despite having the third lowest tax rate, it has the fourth highest income tax rate, which seems rather curious. This huge gap is due to value added tax, which taxes corporations on the increased value of goods should they refine them, like crude oil being refined into petroleum. America has no value added tax, the only country in the OECD to not implement one. For that reason alone, Americans could be seen as missing out on a tax burden that many others face.

All in all taxes are an incredibly complicated and difficult topic. Just trying to explain how they work is quite the hassle, but I've done the best I can. The previous information is all I can offer when wondering are Americans overtaxed?

Sources/links: http://www.schwab.com/public/schwab/nn/articles/Taxes-Whats-New

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Unit 4 Judiciary-The Supreme Court Gets Ready to Legalize Corruption

The article written by Jeffrey Toobin reflects on the possibility of another hit to campaign and finance reform worse than Citizens United that could make corruption legal, at least corruption by a different name. The article talks about the Supreme Court hearing a case from former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell amidst charges of corruption and bribery. A Richmond business man gave over 100,000 dollars to the governor and his wife in the guise of campaign contributions, and although the decision has not yet been made, it looks as though Governor McDonnell will likely get off without charges. The lawyer for McDonnell argues that bribery and corruption only apply if the governor acted on these contributions in a formal way, which according to the lawyer, he did not. Finally the article goes on to say how the deregulation of corruption is all but here. Image result for supreme courtImage result for supreme court

This article reflects the the Judicial portion of Unit 4 well due to the fact that it revolves around the workings of Article III judges and the highest court in America. The judges are using the precedent set forth by the Citizens United case in order to allow Governor McDonnell the ability to petition the court. It seems to me that standing contributions to any politician is corruption, no matter what the purpose. While Citizens United let anyone get someone elected, paying them in office seems to be going over the limit, even that politician doesn’t act “formally” on the payments. The courts are not really using judicial review because there is no law which they are declaring unconstitutional. It seems as though they are attempting to be judicial activists and are ignoring the doctrine of the political question. The Supreme Court should not have to rule on a case that could make buying a politician legal. No matter what the justices decide, it will not be a unanimous decision.

Link to Articlehttp://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-supreme-court-gets-ready-to-legalize-corruption: